| {3} | Triangle |
| {4} | Square |
| {6} | Hexagon |
| {7} | Heptagon |
| {8} | Octagon |
| {9} | Enneagon |
| {10} | Decagon |
| {11} | Hendecagon |
| {12} | Dodecagon |
| {5/2} | Pentagram |
| {6/2} | Hexagram |
| {8/2} | Octagram |
| {8/3} | Octagram |
| {12/2}  | Dodecagram |
This is perhaps not the best example of a dissection of triangle and pentagon, but it is new and it does demonstrate the TT22 technique.
This is not a very elegant solution because of the rather small piece, but it is another example of a TT22 dissection. There are a number of different six piece solutions possible and this raises the question of whether or not a five piece solution exists. There is a range of rectangle shapes that will dissect to a pentagon in just five pieces, but I think it unlikely that anyone will find a five piece solution for the square.
Discovered by Harry Lindgren (1964).
I nearly missed finding this dissection. The grey piece is no nearly cut into two, adding another two pieces to this dissection, that I did not think that it was possible. Fortunately I checked and hence obtained another record.
|
|
The overlay diagrams on the right show the basic dissection before I modify it to save some pieces.
There is room for improvement in this dissection. Is a 9 piece solution possible?
This is another example of a TT22 dissection.
The thin spike makes this a rather inelegant dissection, but I have not been able to find another 9 piece solution.
Compared to the other dodecagram dissections this one is particularly inefficient. This is due to the dimensions of the pentagon making it impractical to form a pentagon tessellation that can overlay a dodecagram tessellation.