Standards and Competencies of an Effective Mediator

We have been training Commercial Mediators in the UK and overseas since 1994 and under the MATA badge since 2001.

Over that time the competencies that make up an effective mediator have evolved. What follows is the criteria by which we assess and accredit mediators to what we consider to be the very highest standard. Highest because we not only assess twice using different assessors (who are independent of the course trainers) but also because they are the only accreditation that has a mandatory competence (one of three competencies).

The three key criteria have details of what the assessors seek under each category.

Key information provided in the Assessment Criteria:

Generally

The Mediator Accreditation Assessment Form is to help the assessors decide if a candidate mediator is competent, using objective and recognised criteria and giving equal opportunity to each candidate.

It is accepted that:

Not all the skills and processes will be demonstrated during assessment. This is not an exercise in getting as much as possible into the allotted time; rather that the candidate demonstrates effectiveness at the time of the assessment in whatever situation is presented.

Not all mediations are the same and what might be appropriate in one might not be so in another. Similarly, mediator styles will be different and the criteria are intended to measure effectiveness (and appropriateness) rather than style.

Conduct of Assessment:

Assessors must use the following grading for each category of skill assessment:

Competent

Not yet competent

‘Competent’ means that the candidate: “Must be able to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the skills and processes of commercial mediation and an ability to use them effectively.”

Competency Categories of Assessment:

People Skills

The relationship between the mediator and the participants in the mediation. Building a trusting relationship is essential for an effective mediator. Being competent in this category is mandatory in both role plays.

The Mediator:

has appropriate appearance and manner
shows appropriate non-verbal communication
is alert to the reactions of others
is conscious of his/her own values and preferences
discretely demonstrates presence/authority
uses appropriate expressions and voice tone and pace.

The Mediator builds rapport by:

showing respect to everyone
valuing all contributions
maintaining eye contact and taking few notes
demonstrating active listening
matching language (picking up key words/jargon)
effective use of silence
checking understanding (by the mediator and the parties of each other)
being alert to emotional needs
showing empathy

The Mediator creates a safe environment:

where people can talk frankly
where people can be open and vulnerable
where people can express emotion

The Mediator appropriately:

uses humour
demonstrates friendliness
addresses parties by first names
shows optimism and energy, particularly when others are wearied
is tenacious, particularly when others are failing


Process Skills

The Mediator’s ability to use the skills and techniques emphasised on the training course. Competency in using a variety of appropriate skills to establish parties’ needs and help them towards settlement.

The Mediator demonstrates/encourages understanding by:

appropriate summarising
reframing, especially negative to positive language
stressing confidentiality (and keeping it)
acknowledging feelings and comments
encouraging parties to ‘step into other’s shoes’
maintaining optimism and momentum

The Mediator uses appropriate questioning skills:

by being interested rather that inquisitorial
using appropriate questions:
open questions to gather information in the early stages of mediation
closed questions to check understanding
hypothetical questions to test solutions
challenging questions to test reality
avoiding multiple and leading questions
including silence

The Mediator tests parties’ positions by:

effective reality testing
assisting risk assessment
challenging assumptions
anticipating consequences
keeping parties responsible for the problem and the solution

The Mediator demonstrates competence in negotiation by:

the strategic use of information
coaching parties to use offers/information to best effect
exploring options creatively, particularly non-financial possibilities
manoeuvring parties into the settlement zone
avoiding deadlock
helping parties save face
avoiding shuttling offers
helping parties bridge gaps


Management of the mediation

The firm and tactical use of the process and skills. Creating an environment to give the parties the best opportunity of achieving a settlement.

The Mediator sets an appropriate tome:

by explaining the Mediator’s role
through the introduction covering: confidentiality; authority to settle; no imposed settlement; not binding until writing; voluntary process; mediator’s neutrality; without prejudice
dealing with interruptions
managing emotion
challenging inappropriate behaviour
in an optimistic atmosphere
settling ground rules: respect; open to settlement;no violence (word or physical)

The Mediator is a facilitator, not a dictator, by:

encouraging communication between the parties
identifying the key issues and prioritises if appropriate
ensuring even-handedness, particularly when there is an imbalance of power
helping parties move from the past to future
emphasising voluntary process
being flexible with the style of meetings
enabling parties to construct their own solution
never giving advice

The Mediator is a ‘safe pair of hands’, by:

creating confidence in the parties
showing patience and consideration
showing wisdom in decision-making
being even-handed
involving everyone
maintaining focus and momentum

The Mediator manages the process efficiently by:

keeping parties informed of developments
managing time
setting tasks to occupy the idle
using the physical space to maximum effect
taking breaks
using visual aids


Pass: To pass, candidates must be competent in People Skills in both role plays and in Process Skills and Management Skills at least once in either of their role plays.

Fail: If a candidate fails the assessment, they will need to undertake further training, at their own expense, before attempting assessment again.