Consequence Factors

Significance
of
Consequences Technical
Factors Cost
Factors Schedule
Factors

Low (0.1) Minimal Budget Estimates not exceeded.
Some transfer of $ Within Available Slack.

Minor (0.3) Some Reduction in Performance Exceed Budget by 1 to 5% Minor Slip in Schedule. Some Milestones Adjusted.

Moderate (0.5) Some Reduction in Performance Cost Estimates Increased by 5 to 20% SmallSlip

Significant (0.7) Significant Degradation in Performance Cost Estimates Increased by 20 to 30% 3 monthsslip

High (> 0.9) Technical Goals Not Met Cost Estimates Increase 50% Schedule Slips Impact System Milestones.

Consequence Factors

**Consequence Factors**
Significance of Consequences	Technical Factors	Cost Factors	Schedule Factors
Low (0.1)	Minimal	Budget Estimates not exceeded. Some transfer of $	Within Available Slack.
Minor (0.3)	Some Reduction in Performance	Exceed Budget by 1 to 5%	Minor Slip in Schedule. Some Milestones Adjusted.
Moderate (0.5)	Some Reduction in Performance	Cost Estimates Increased by 5 to 20%	SmallSlip
Significant (0.7)	Significant Degradation in Performance	Cost Estimates Increased by 20 to 30%	3 monthsslip
High (> 0.9)	Technical Goals Not Met	Cost Estimates Increase 50%	Schedule Slips Impact System Milestones.

Determine a value for each of the three columns. Average these three values. This average is the Pc factor.

LE FastCounter

Back to Home page MANAGING STANDARDS Home page

Please send any beneficial comments or identification of errors using the following form to: kenr@wysywig.airtime.co.uk